Re: Pre-page images in WAL - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD
Subject Re: Pre-page images in WAL
Date
Msg-id 46C15C39FEB2C44BA555E356FBCD6FA41EB437@m0114.s-mxs.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Pre-page images in WAL  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
> In the brave new world of WAL, Postgres does not flush dirty buffers
to
> disk at transaction commit, relying on WAL to clean up if a database
or
> system failure occurs.  If we don't log page images to WAL then I
think
> there's a hole here wherein a Postgres crash can lose data even though
> no failure of the surrounding OS occurs.  Maybe it's safe, but I'm not
> convinced.

It should be (imho *is*) safe for heap pages, but not for index pages.
The reasoning for heap pages is, that the WAL code (pre page image)
already
coped with future heap page versions.

I would not expect it to work for index pages, since one "feature" of
the page images was to "undo" future index operations.

Andreas


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD"
Date:
Subject: Re: insert/update/delete statements returning a query response
Next
From: "John Gray"
Date:
Subject: Re: 7.2 stuff