Re: Storage Location Patch Proposal for V7.3 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD
Subject Re: Storage Location Patch Proposal for V7.3
Date
Msg-id 46C15C39FEB2C44BA555E356FBCD6FA41EB3F8@m0114.s-mxs.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Storage Location Patch Proposal for V7.3  ("Jim Buttafuoco" <jim@buttafuoco.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
 
> Since "tablespace" is not part of the SQL standard, maybe it makes
sense to
> define a more specific syntax. The term "location" makes sense,
because it is
> not a tablespace as Oracle defines it.

It *is* an "OS managed tablespace" in terms of IBM DB2.
Methinks the term "TABLESPACE" is perfect for PostgreSQL.
The fact whether it is a directory, a file or even a raw device
depends on how you create the tablespace.

The point is, that the syntax for "create table" and "create index"
can be compatible in this case, imho without confusing many. 
Not the "create tablespace" syntax, but that is imho not an issue.

Andreas


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: mlw
Date:
Subject: Re: Storage Location Patch Proposal for V7.3
Next
From: Stefan Rindeskar
Date:
Subject: Re: Storage Location Patch Proposal for V7.3