Andreas Pflug wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>>
>> Not for Wordpad though, and it's pretty universal too. And Notepad
>> won't load a file of any great size anyway. Furthermore, we just can't
>> have this alongside the pipe chunking protocol, so I'm inclined to
>> blow it away altogether, unless there are pretty loud squawks.
>> Especially for machine-readable logs, we want the log file to get
>> *exactly* what we send it.
>>
> Well I'd LOVE reliably machine-readable logs, but I think that will
> collide with human-readability.
>
>
>
No it won't. Watch this space :-)
cheers
andrew
