Dave Page wrote:
> Greg Smith wrote:
>> After today's flurry of messages on this topic, I found myself wanting
>> a summary of what I'd learned about the current state of things before
>> the details slipped away. Somewhere in the middle of writing that, it
>> morphed into an advocacy piece, so I figured why not put it on the Wiki:
>>
>> http://developer.postgresql.org/index.php?title=Why_PostgreSQL_instead_of_MySQL
>>
>>
>> I may circle back to filling some of the stub sections myself
>> eventually, you're all encouraged to beat me to it.
>
> Greg,
>
> This piece is clearly aimed at end users and shouldn't be on the
> developers Wiki (which is only for internal project
> documentation/notes). Please move it over to techdocs, or refocus it as
> a guide for use by booth staff etc.
As the developer wiki is already being used for a bunch of advocacy
efforts, I believe that it is more than acceptable.
Joshua D. Drake
>
> Regards, Dave.
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org
>
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
