Re: 8.2 is 30% better in pgbench than 8.3 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: 8.2 is 30% better in pgbench than 8.3
Date
Msg-id 46A37DCF.5070003@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 8.2 is 30% better in pgbench than 8.3  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: 8.2 is 30% better in pgbench than 8.3  (Jim Nasby <decibel@decibel.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom,

> Note to all: we ***HAVE TO*** settle on some reasonable default
> vacuum_cost_delay settings before we can ship 8.3.  With no cost delay
> and two or three workers active, 8.3's autovac does indeed send
> performance into the tank.

I've been using 20ms for most of my setups.  That's aimed at reducing 
autovac to almost no impact at all, but taking a long time.  Maybe 10ms?

--Josh



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: 8.2 is 30% better in pgbench than 8.3
Next
From: "Florian G. Pflug"
Date:
Subject: Full page images in WAL & Cache Invalidation