Tom Lane wrote:
> I suspect that error messages coming out of the syslogger itself (and
> directed to the original stderr destination) will be similarly broken.
>
I thought we had that case handled, but I could be wrong.
> So that patch still needs work.
Yes, darnit.
> I think we probably need a flag
> variable separate from the GUC variable to tell when to send using
> the chunk protocol.
>
>
Sounds reasonable. I will try to get to it this week.
cheers
andrew
