Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 08:05 -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> You must misunderstand the meaning of the word "The" then. It indicates
> a definite article, such that there is only one. There is more than one
> "PostgreSQL Company", therefore the statement is innacurate and
> therefore misleading.
If you wish to bring this up in another thread, please feel free to do so.
>
>>> - how it is that you say "We are the only dedicated PostgreSQL company,
>>> focusing all of our efforts on the promotion and proliferation of pure
>>> PostgreSQL",
>> Where did you get that quote, because I don't see it anywhere. We do
>> say, "Command Prompt, Inc. is the oldest and only dedicated PostgreSQL
>> support provider in North America. Since 1997, we have been developing,
>> supporting, deploying and advocating the use of the “World's Most
>> Advanced Open Source Database”."
>
> I got it off your web site this morning and it is still there, on the
> link I gave.
Ahh! found it.. might have been helpful if you actually told me where it
is. I will get it fixed.
The quote that you provide will indeed be fixed and was an oversight.
Thank you for bringing it to our attention. I would ask in the future
that you actually keep the thread on topic however. I invite you to
start another -advocacy thread if you wish on gripes you have about how
CMD represents the community.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
