-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
This is one bet I'm glad to lose. :-)
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Ned Wolpert escribió:
>
>> In my current production environment, the PostgreSQL database server
>> is the latest, 8.2.4. The apps that communicate with it are planned
>> to be running on stock CentOS5 servers, with the default 8.1.x (8.1.9)
>> client libraries. So, not only is psql 8.1.9 (which I don't use on
>> that server) but the libpq.so is from the 8.1.9 install. Apache 2.2
>> package uses the DBDriver module from the apr-util that was installed
>> from CentOS, and we are planning to connect it to our PostgreSQL
>> server. Is that a 'bad thing' considering the libpq.so is a different
>> major version?
>
> No. It is only a problem for psql because it uses some queries that
> assume things about the system catalogs (for example psql 8.2 assumes
> that pg_index.indisvalid exists, which it doesn't on 8.1).
>
> Did you win the bet?
>
- --
Virtually,
Ned Wolpert <ned.wolpert@gmail.com> ACF63C1E
An idea is something you have; an ideology is something that has you.
-Morris Berman
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFGlp+92nkMaKz2PB4RAp0iAJ9jUJPlExZSf1y0XHsQAfS9rTBWjwCeNDzS
TNS8x8Bf4Wu1BSjBH+CdJnE=
=9hq3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
