On 07/11/07 12:06, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 10:28:25PM +0530, Joshua N Pritikin wrote:
>> and foo is executed from different transactions in parallel then each
>> transaction will see its own private temp table, right?
>
> They will see their own private temp tables _no matter what_.
> There's no "shared temp table" support in Postgres.
Will GLOBAL TEMP tables be added any time soon?
I know the docs say that the standards implies needing modules, but
"shared definition" is really handy. We use regularly such GLOBAL
TEMP tables without modules.
--
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
Give a man a fish, and he eats for a day.
Hit him with a fish, and he goes away for good!
