Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: PostgreSQL publishes first real benchmark - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Jignesh K. Shah
Subject Re: PostgreSQL publishes first real benchmark
Date
Msg-id 469522A5.1070409@sun.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PostgreSQL publishes first real benchmark  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: PostgreSQL publishes first real benchmark  (Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc>)
List pgsql-performance
Tree view 
Can you list others that seemed out of place?

Thanks.
Regards,
Jignesh


Tom Lane wrote:
> "Jignesh K. Shah" <J.K.Shah@Sun.COM> writes:
>
>> Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>>
>>> May I ask you why you set max_prepared_transactions to 450, while
>>> you're apparently not using prepared transactions, according to this
>>> quote:
>>>
>
>
>> Yep.. one of the things that we didn't revert back and got strayed out
>> there.
>>
>
> There were quite a few settings in that list that looked like random
> experimentation rather than recommendable good practice to me.
>
>             regards, tom lane
>

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Andreas Kretschmer
Date:
Subject: bitmap-index-scan slower than normal index scan
Next
From: Greg Smith
Date:
Subject: Re: best use of an EMC SAN