Re: performance problems inserting random vals in index - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Leonardo F
Subject Re: performance problems inserting random vals in index
Date
Msg-id 468728.53329.qm@web29006.mail.ird.yahoo.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: performance problems inserting random vals in index  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-general
> Does it help to reindex the index at that point?

Didn't try; but I guess a reindex of such a big table
would block inserts for a long time... but I'll try

> Bad.  The partitioning code isn't designed to scale
> beyond a few dozen partitions.


What kind of problems am I going to experience?
It's just a N times access to the index or something
worse? It's the fact that it will take a linear amount of
time to "pick" the right partitions?





pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Craig Ringer
Date:
Subject: Re: modification time & transaction synchronisation problem
Next
From: Leonardo F
Date:
Subject: Re: performance problems inserting random vals in index