Re: AutoVacuum Behaviour Question - Mailing list pgsql-general
From | Bruce McAlister |
---|---|
Subject | Re: AutoVacuum Behaviour Question |
Date | |
Msg-id | 46819AB2.5030905@blueface.ie Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: AutoVacuum Behaviour Question (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>) |
Responses |
Re: AutoVacuum Behaviour Question
|
List | pgsql-general |
Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Bruce McAlister wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> I have enabled autovacuum in our PostgreSQL cluster of databases. What I >> have noticed is that the autovacuum process keeps selecting the same >> database to perform autovacuums on and does not select any of the others >> within the cluster. Is this normal behaviour or do I need to do >> something more elaborate with my settings? > > There are two reasons autovacuum would keep picking up the same > database: > > 1. the other databases do not have pgstat entries. > > 2. this database is in danger of Xid wraparound and the vacuum run > fails to complete for some reason. > >> Our main concern is the "blueface-service" database. The sipaccounts >> table has some high traffic, mainly updates. > > Are there non-null values in the pg_stat views for tables in > blueface-service database? If there are, then you can discard (1) as > the problem. If all values are nulls for all tables, then you have the > stats collector disabled for that database, or something (maybe by ALTER > DATABASE ... SET). In this case, reenable it and issue a manual VACUUM > so that pgstat is populated. (I think the easiest way to check is > SELECT datname, datconfig FROM pg_database). I have just checked the pg_stat_all_tables in the pg_catalog schema and I can see the index scans etc table values incrementing. The data in the tables seems to be updating. Just an FYI, I've enabled manual vacuum analyze runs on the blueface-service database up until we've found whats going wrong here. The output from the select query you suggested is as follows: datname | datconfig -------------------------+----------- postgres | blueface-webmail | blueface-billingreports | blueface-service | blueface-cards | template1 | template0 | blueface-crmsupport | blueface-qualmon | asterisk-cdrgw | hylafax | thelab-sipswitch | whitelabel-ibb | whitelabel-pleasant | whitelabel-rapid | whitelabel-test | whitelabel-worlddest | blueface-crm | blueface-billedcalls | asterisk-cdr | mysipswitch | whitelabel-ice | > > Regarding (2) you would need to check whether the autovacuum run dies > with an ERROR. I'd advise setting a log_line_prefix that included the > PID (%p) so that you can check whether the process goes away cleanly or > it dies early. It is not impossible that a corrupt index or table is > causing autovacuum to die, but it should certainly show up in the logs. > I enabled the log_line_prefix option and put in a %p in the value, and I only get the following output from the logs: Jun 26 23:46:07 bfiedb01 postgres[2836]: [ID 748848 local0.debug] [5-1] 2836 DEBUG: autovacuum: processing database "blueface-crm" Jun 26 23:47:32 bfiedb01 postgres[2863]: [ID 748848 local0.debug] [5-1] 2863 DEBUG: autovacuum: processing database "blueface-crm" I cant really tell from these logs if the process is dying early or not. I have also just run a 'REINDEX DATABASE "blueface-crm";' just to ensure that the indexes are sane. I've also just run a manual 'VACUUM ANALYZE FULL VERBOSE;' just to ensure it goes through manually. What does the DEBUG1 output of a normal autovacuum run look like in the log file? Any other suggestions would be greatly appreciated. Thanks
pgsql-general by date: