Tom Lane wrote:
> Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com> writes:
>
>> All that really has to happen is that dblink should by default not be
>> callable by any user other than Postgres.
>>
>
> Yeah, that is not an unreasonable change. Someone suggested it far
> upthread, but we seem to have gotten distracted :-(
>
>
>> The only problem with this is that dblink provides 36 different functions
>>
>
> I think just having the install script revoke public execute access
> on the connection-establishing functions would be sufficient. There
> are only two of 'em.
>
>
>
+1 on this.
cheers
andrew
