On 3/6/23 1:27 PM, Brad White wrote:
> In that picture, it's clear what is happening.
> Here, again, is the result that had me stumped.
> image.png
> What threw me was that the field I was looking for had the format of
> 6d-4d and this field appeared to have the same format.
> But once you expand it, you can see that it has a 6d-7d format and isn't
> the field I'm looking for at all. I was trying to take a shortcut by
> finding the data in the table instead of digging in and looking up what
> field was used in the report. And it appeared at first that I had found
> it. ¯\_(?)_/¯
psql is your friend.
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@aklaver.com
