Francisco Reyes wrote:
> Scott Marlowe writes:
>
>> and a bit more resiliant to drive failure, RAID-5 can give you a lot
>> of storage and very good read performance, so it works well for
>> reporting /
>
> New controllers now also have Raid 6, which from the few reports I
> have seen seems to have a good compromise of performance and space.
>
Very true. And if they've gone to the trouble of implementing RAID-6,
they're usually at least halfway decent controllers.
