Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
>> If SQL was not a popular standard, we would drop it. You and Alvaro are
>> saying that 'm' for meter and 'min' for minute is commonly recognized
>> outside the USA/UK, so that is good enough for me to say that the
>> existing setup is fine.
>
> If we're not going to make the units-parsing any more friendly, for
> gosh sakes let's at least make it give a HINT about what it will accept.
yeah a proper HINT seem like a very reasonable compromise ...
Stefan