On 10.03.25 10:49, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 02.03.25 22:08, Thomas Munro wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 3, 2025 at 6:21 AM Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>
>> wrote:
>>> On 05.12.24 23:18, Thomas Munro wrote:
>>>> Old: errmsg("hello %llu", (unsigned long long) x)
>>>> New: errmsg("hello %" PRIu64, x)
>>>
>>> I have committed the subset of this patch for pg_checksums.c so that the
>>> translators and whoever else might be affected can try this out at small
>>> scale. (I don't expect any particular problems.) Then we can move on
>>> to the rest in a few weeks, I think.
>>
>> Good plan, thanks. Here's a rebase.
>
> I think this went ok, and we can proceed here.
>
> I looked through the v2-0001 patch in detail. Most of it is mechanical,
> so no problems. I couple of issues you already mentioned:
I have committed v2-0001, omitting the parts that I had flagged in my
review. I have also committed v2-0002. From my perspective, this can
conclude this thread.
