Re: Reducing NUMERIC size for 8.3 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andreas Pflug
Subject Re: Reducing NUMERIC size for 8.3
Date
Msg-id 46769D14.6090107@pse-consulting.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Reducing NUMERIC size for 8.3  ("Simon Riggs" <simon@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: Reducing NUMERIC size for 8.3  ("Simon Riggs" <simon@2ndquadrant.com>)
Re: Reducing NUMERIC size for 8.3  (Michael Paesold <mpaesold@gmx.at>)
Re: Reducing NUMERIC size for 8.3  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Simon Riggs wrote:
> The objections to applying this patch originally were:
> 2. it would restrict number of digits to 508 and there are allegedly
> some people that want to store > 508 digits.
>   
If 508 digits are not enough, are1000 digits be sufficient? Both limits
appear quite arbitrary to me.

Regards,
Andreas



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Reducing NUMERIC size for 8.3
Next
From: "Simon Riggs"
Date:
Subject: Re: Reducing NUMERIC size for 8.3