Francisco Reyes wrote:
> Walter Vaughan writes:
>> I am not even sure this is a problem.
>> INFO: "data_import_customer2": scanned 3000 of 5033 pages, containing
>> 84905 live rows and 0 dead rows; 3000 rows in sample, 142442 estimated
>> total rows
>
> I don't believe it is a problem.
> I think it is just normal output of the vacuum.
> What made you think there could be a problem?
Well, why did it only scan 3000 pages out of 5033? It decided it didn't need to?
It took a sample and decided it was gonna be okay?
