Re: Got no response last time on setsockopt post, so I thought I would reiterate. - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: Got no response last time on setsockopt post, so I thought I would reiterate.
Date
Msg-id 466DDC0D.7020503@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Got no response last time on setsockopt post, so I thought I would reiterate.  ("Dann Corbit" <DCorbit@connx.com>)
Responses Re: Got no response last time on setsockopt post, so I thought I would reiterate.  ("Dann Corbit" <DCorbit@connx.com>)
List pgsql-hackers

Dann Corbit wrote:
> However, I won't twist your arm.  I just wanted to be sure that those at
> the PostgreSQL organization were aware of this simple trick.  Our
> products run on:
> Aix
> BeOS
> Hpux
> Linux (everywhere, including mainframe zLinux)
> MVS
> SunOS
> Solaris
> OpenVMS Alpha
> OpenVMS VAX
> OpenVMS Itanium
> Windows
>
> And several others
>
>
>
>   

We already set the SNDBUF on Windows for reasons documented in the code.

I think if you were to quantify the alleged improvement by platform it 
might allay suspicion.

cheers

andrew


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Dann Corbit"
Date:
Subject: Re: Got no response last time on setsockopt post, so I thought I would reiterate.
Next
From: "Dann Corbit"
Date:
Subject: Re: Got no response last time on setsockopt post, so I thought I would reiterate.