david@lang.hm wrote:
>> On Fri, 8 Jun 2007, Dave Cramer wrote:
>>
>>> Is it possible that providing 128G of ram is too much ? Will other
>>> systems
>>> in the server bottleneck ?
>
> the only way 128G of ram would be too much is if your total database
> size (including indexes) is smaller then this.
>
> now it may not gain you as much of an advantage going from 64G to 128G
> as it does going from 32G to 64G, but that depends on many variables as
> others have been asking.
I don't know about the IBM but I know some of the HPs require slower ram
to actually get to 128G.
Joshua D. Drake
>
> David Lang
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org
>
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
