Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Do we need a TODO? (was Re: Concurrently updating an updatable view) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Richard Huxton
Subject Do we need a TODO? (was Re: Concurrently updating an updatable view)
Date
Msg-id 4653097E.4050006@archonet.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Concurrently updating an updatable view  ("Florian G. Pflug" <fgp@phlo.org>)
Responses Re: Do we need a TODO? (was Re: Concurrently updating an updatable view)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
Florian G. Pflug wrote:
> 
> Is there consensus what the correct behaviour should be for
> self-referential updates in read-committed mode? Does the SQL Spec
> have anything to say about this?

This seems to have gone all quiet. Do we need a TODO to keep a note of 
it? Just "correct behaviour for self-referential updates"

Hiroshi originally noted the problem in one of his views here:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2007-05/msg00507.php

--   Richard Huxton  Archonet Ltd

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Shachar Shemesh
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: [Oledb-dev] double precision error with pg linux server, but not with windows pg server
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [BUGS] Inconsistant SQL results - Suspected error with query planing or query optimisation.