Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> Since there seem to be multiple static checkers (coverity, clang
> checker) having problems with assert_enabled can we just optionally
> disable it?
> I am thinking of replacing it by a AssertionsEnabled() macro which then
> is unconditionally defined when DISABLE_ENABLE_ASSERT is defined.
We could do that ... but I wonder if we shouldn't remove assert_enabled
altogether. What's the use case for turning it off? Not matching the
speed of a non-cassert build, because for instance MEMORY_CONTEXT_CHECKING
doesn't get turned off.
If we went this direction I'd suggest keeping the GUC but turning it into
a read-only report of whether the backend was compiled with assertions.
regards, tom lane
