Re: Not ready for 8.3 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: Not ready for 8.3
Date
Msg-id 464B4C5F.70800@commandprompt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Not ready for 8.3  (Ron Mayer <rm_pg@cheapcomplexdevices.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Ron Mayer wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>> Josh Berkus wrote:
>>> I think that may be where we're heading.  In that case, we may need to
>>> talk about branching earlier so that developers can work on the new
>>> version who are frozen out of the in-process one.
>> I've argued this in the past. But be aware that it will make more work
>> for committers. It is very far from cost-free.
> 
> I hate to bring up the CMS flamewar again, but IMHO the one advantage
> the distributed systems (Git, Monotone, Darcs, etc) have over CVS &
> subversion is that they push this branch management cost down to the
> developer who wants a branch - rather from the guys maintaining the
> official CMS.

One step at a time :). We are now married, and have just begun to have 
have children. We need to buy a house in the next year, and figure out 
how to pay off some debt without going into hock up to our ears with a 
long term low interest loan.

Joshua D. Drake



> 
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
> 
>                http://archives.postgresql.org
> 



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Ron Mayer
Date:
Subject: Re: Not ready for 8.3
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Managing the community information stream