Re: BUG #3265: 8.1 -> 8.2 behviour change: View owner must have access to underlying tables - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Russell Smith
Subject Re: BUG #3265: 8.1 -> 8.2 behviour change: View owner must have access to underlying tables
Date
Msg-id 4642DAA4.5090204@pws.com.au
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: BUG #3265: 8.1 -> 8.2 behviour change: View owner must have access to underlying tables  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: BUG #3265: 8.1 -> 8.2 behviour change: View owner must have access to underlying tables  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-bugs
Tom Lane wrote:
> "Russell Smith" <mr-russ@pws.com.au> writes:
>
>> CREATE view v1 as select * from t1;
>> ALTER TABLE v1 OWNER TO "USER";
>>
>
> See thread here:
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2006-04/msg01138.php
> and patch here:
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2006-09/msg00101.php
>
> This was not back-patched because it seemed like too much of a behavior
> change for stable branches.
>
Thanks,

I forgot the link between RULES and views.

But this also means that a super user is not really a super user
anymore.  Are we comfortable with this redefinition?

Russell
>             regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>
>

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: "Jack Ho"
Date:
Subject: Is PostgresSQL supported in Windows Vista?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #3265: 8.1 -> 8.2 behviour change: View owner must have access to underlying tables