Re: including backend ID in relpath of temp rels - updated patch - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: including backend ID in relpath of temp rels - updated patch
Date
Msg-id 4637.1281049501@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: including backend ID in relpath of temp rels - updated patch  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: including backend ID in relpath of temp rels - updated patch  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> [ BackendRelFileNode patch ]

One thing that I find rather distressing about this is the 25% bloat
in sizeof(SharedInvalidationMessage).  Couldn't we avoid that?  Is it
really necessary to *ever* send an SI message for a backend-local rel?

I agree that one needs to send relcache inval sometimes for temp rels,
but I don't see why each backend couldn't interpret that as a flush
on its own local version.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Mike Fowler
Date:
Subject: Re: Initial review of xslt with no limits patch
Next
From: Mark Kirkwood
Date:
Subject: Re: Concurrent MERGE