Re: libpq's pollution of application namespace - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: libpq's pollution of application namespace
Date
Msg-id 4636.1150324277@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: libpq's pollution of application namespace  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> What would make sense to work on
>> is making the build step that strips not-officially-exported symbols
>> work on more platforms.

> Uh, well, I had some patches in the patch queue to go in that direction,
> but I thought the conclusion in that thread was that it wasn't worth it.

We currently have coverage for Linux and Darwin.  If we had coverage for
the *BSDen I would figure it was close enough ... is it possible to do
the *BSDen with a few more makefile lines, or is it too ugly?
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: Multi-byte and client side character encoding
Next
From: Martijn van Oosterhout
Date:
Subject: Re: libpq's pollution of application namespace