Dave Page wrote:
>
> In my original message I described my thinking:
>
> - Developer submits patch, with additional info through a web interface.
>
> - The web interface formats an email containing the patch description,
> patch and any other info entered, assigns it a patch number, and
> forwards it to the patches list.
>
> - Discussion ensues on list as per normal. The tracking system monitors
> the list and automatically attaches any posts to the patch that have the
> appropriate reference in the subject line.
>
> - Community members and committers can review the entire discussion
> through the systems web interface. Updated patches could be submitted
> online.
>
> - Committers log into the system when necessary to alter the status
> (committed, rejected, awaiting revision, under review etc), or the queue
> name (8.3, 8.4 etc). This could also be done automagically via email
> keywords from specific addresses.
>
> You would no longer need to manually manage the queue, and the
> committers would simply need to tweak the status flag as required.
>
You can look on Apache Derby project. I think everything what you
mentioned there Derby project is using.
See http://db.apache.org/derby/
Zdenek
