Re: Windows support - PostgreSQL 8.0 and 8.1 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: Windows support - PostgreSQL 8.0 and 8.1
Date
Msg-id 4631E450.7060004@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Windows support - PostgreSQL 8.0 and 8.1  (Dave Page <dpage@postgresql.org>)
Responses Re: Windows support - PostgreSQL 8.0 and 8.1  (Dave Page <dpage@postgresql.org>)
Re: Windows support - PostgreSQL 8.0 and 8.1  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers

Dave Page wrote:
>
> * The stats collector bug which prevented stats being collected
> reliably, thus causing all the expected knock on effects (including
> near-total failure of autovacuum). The 8.2 fix for this was dependent
> on the redesign of the collector to remove the separate stats buffering
> process.
>
> * Semaphore issues, fixed by the native implementation in 8.2.
>
>
>   
I think these two justify declaring the Windows port at EOL prior to 
8.2. The others probably not so much. (Who cares if pg_regress is not a 
C program? Who besides developers uses it?)

I hope this will be a one-off exercise, though. In general we should 
declare releases to be at EOL, not ports.

cheers

andrew


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Gregory Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: When the locially dropped column is also physically dropped
Next
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: Hi, I wanto joinin the developer group of postgresql