Re: Warning compiling pg_dump (MinGW, Windows XP) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Pavel Golub
Subject Re: Warning compiling pg_dump (MinGW, Windows XP)
Date
Msg-id 462853531.20110118114026@gf.microolap.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Warning compiling pg_dump (MinGW, Windows XP)  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: Warning compiling pg_dump (MinGW, Windows XP)  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hello, Andrew.

You wrote:



AD> On 01/17/2011 03:51 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Andrew Dunstan<andrew@dunslane.net>  writes:
>>> On 01/17/2011 07:18 AM, Pavel Golub wrote:
>>>> So you think I should just ignore these warnings? Because I can't
>>>> remember the same behaviour on 8.x branches...
>>> We've had them all along, as I said. See
>>> <http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_stage_log.pl?nm=frogmouth&dt=2011-01-04%2023%3A54%3A16&stg=make>
>>> for the same thing in an 8.2 build.
>> I wonder why mingw's gcc is complaining about %m when other versions of
>> gcc do not?  If you can't get it to shut up about that, there's not
>> going to be much percentage in silencing warnings about %lld.
>>
>>                       

AD> We could add -Wno-format to the flags. That makes it shut up, but maybe
AD> we don't want to use such a sledgehammer.

I want to understand the only thing. Are these warnings really
dangerous? Or I should just ignore them?

AD> cheers

AD> andrew



-- 
With best wishes,Pavel                          mailto:pavel@gf.microolap.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Pavel Golub
Date:
Subject: Re: Warning compiling pg_dump (MinGW, Windows XP)
Next
From: Dimitri Fontaine
Date:
Subject: Re: REVIEW: Extensions support for pg_dump