Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Robert Treat wrote:
>> On Tuesday 17 April 2007 20:54, Tom Lane wrote:
>
>>> I'm not excited about the other ones but I can see the argument for
>>> making pg_dump force the timeout to 0.
>> Allowing pg_dump to run un-checked could also lead to problems such as
>> exceeding maintenence windows causing performance issues, or causing trouble
>> due to lock contention with ongoing pg_dumps.
If you have that problem, you need bigger hardware. pg_dump is a
priority application. Not to mention, if you *really* want that time of
behavior it is easy enough to wrap pg_dump in perl or python.
Let the foot guns be available to those that can script them :)
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
