Re: unexpected check constraint violation - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Christophe
Subject Re: unexpected check constraint violation
Date
Msg-id 4623B764-D93E-469B-A684-D07F14023C97@thebuild.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: unexpected check constraint violation  (Jeremy Harris <jgh@wizmail.org>)
List pgsql-general
On Mar 23, 2009, at 1:41 PM, Jeremy Harris wrote:
> Because equality is not well-defined for "real" values?

That was my first thought, too, but why would two identical real
literals evaluate to different bit patterns?

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Jeremy Harris
Date:
Subject: Re: unexpected check constraint violation
Next
From: ries van Twisk
Date:
Subject: Re: unexpected check constraint violation