Re: PSA: we lack TAP test coverage on NetBSD and OpenBSD - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: PSA: we lack TAP test coverage on NetBSD and OpenBSD
Date
Msg-id 4615.1547792324@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PSA: we lack TAP test coverage on NetBSD and OpenBSD  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: PSA: we lack TAP test coverage on NetBSD and OpenBSD  (Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>)
List pgsql-hackers
BTW, if you're wondering why curculio is still failing the pgbench
test, all is explained here:

https://man.openbsd.org/srandom

Or at least most is explained there.  While curculio is unsurprisingly
failing all four seeded_random tests, when I try it locally on an
OpenBSD 6.4 installation, only the uniform, exponential, and gaussian
cases reliably "fail".  zipfian usually doesn't.  It looks like the
zipfian code almost always produces 4000 regardless of the seed value,
though occasionally it produces 4001.  Bad parameters for that
algorithm, perhaps?

            regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: sho kato
Date:
Subject: Re: Delay locking partitions during INSERT and UPDATE
Next
From: "Tsunakawa, Takayuki"
Date:
Subject: RE: Libpq support to connect to standby server as priority