Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: elog(FATAL) vs shared memory - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Mark Shuttleworth
Subject Re: elog(FATAL) vs shared memory
Date
Msg-id 4614BFC7.9090103@ubuntu.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to elog(FATAL) vs shared memory  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: elog(FATAL) vs shared memory  (Stuart Bishop <stuart.bishop@canonical.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
Tom Lane wrote: <blockquote cite="mid23609.1175709890@sss.pgh.pa.us" type="cite"><pre wrap="">(1) something (still not
surewhat --- Martin and Mark, I'd really like
 
to know) was issuing random SIGTERMs to various postgres processes
including autovacuum. </pre></blockquote><br /> This may be a misfeature in our test harness - I'll ask Stuart Bishop
tocomment.<br /><br /> Mark<br />

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Nikolay Samokhvalov"
Date:
Subject: Re: --enable-xml instead of --with-libxml?
Next
From: Stuart Bishop
Date:
Subject: Re: elog(FATAL) vs shared memory