Tom Lane írta:
> Zoltan Boszormenyi <zb@cybertec.at> writes:
>
>> The idea wouldn't have considered to cross my mind
>> if Tom didn't mention the action-at-a-distance behaviour.
>>
>
> AFAIR, that remark had to do with NEXT VALUE FOR, which SQL2003 defines
> in a very weird way (it's not equivalent to nextval() as one would wish).
> I don't see anything strange in the spec for GENERATED.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
Thanks for clarifying.
Please review the version I sent you.
--
----------------------------------
Zoltán Böszörményi
Cybertec Geschwinde & Schönig GmbH
http://www.postgresql.at/
