Re: scalablility problem - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Xiaoning Ding
Subject Re: scalablility problem
Date
Msg-id 460FF128.8090403@cse.ohio-state.edu
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: scalablility problem  (Ron Mayer <rm_pg@cheapcomplexdevices.com>)
Responses Re: scalablility problem  (Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com>)
List pgsql-performance
I repeated the test again. It took 0.92 second under 8.2.3.
I checked system load using top and ps. There is no other
active processes.

Xiaoning

Ron Mayer wrote:
> Xiaoning Ding wrote:
>> Postgresql is 7.3.18. [...]
>> 1 process takes 0.65 second to finish.
>
>> I update PG to 8.2.3. The results are [...] now.
>> 1 process :    0.94 second
>
> You sure about your test environment?  Anything else
> running at the same time, perhaps?
>
> I'm a bit surprised that 8.2.3 would be 40% slower than 7.3.18
> even in the single process case.
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>
>


pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Ron Mayer
Date:
Subject: Re: scalablility problem
Next
From: Dave Cramer
Date:
Subject: Re: scalablility problem