Re: scalablility problem - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Xiaoning Ding
Subject Re: scalablility problem
Date
Msg-id 460D8371.7080405@cse.ohio-state.edu
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: scalablility problem  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: scalablility problem  (Scott Marlowe <smarlowe@g2switchworks.com>)
Re: scalablility problem  (Ron Mayer <rm_pg@cheapcomplexdevices.com>)
List pgsql-performance
Thanks guys,

I update PG to 8.2.3. The results are much better now.
1 process :    0.94 second
2 processes: 1.32 seconds
4 processes: 2.03 seconds
8 processes: 2.54 seconds

Do you think they are good enough?
BTW where can I found some info on what 8.2.3 did to improve
scalability compared with pre 8.1 versions?


Xiaoning

Tom Lane wrote:
> Xiaoning Ding <dingxn@cse.ohio-state.edu> writes:
>> When I run multiple TPC-H queries (DBT3) on  postgresql, I found the system
>> is not scalable.  My machine has 8GB memory, and 4 Xeon Dual Core processor
>> ( 8 cores in total). OS kernel is linux 2.6.9. Postgresql is 7.3.18.
>
> If you are not running PG 8.1 or later, it's really not worth your time
> to test this.  Multiprocessor scalability was hardly even on the radar
> in 7.3 days.
>
>             regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
>
>


pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: scalablility problem
Next
From: Scott Marlowe
Date:
Subject: Re: scalablility problem