Re: Wrong plan sequential scan instead of an index one - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Gaetano Mendola
Subject Re: Wrong plan sequential scan instead of an index one
Date
Msg-id 460CE19A.3060909@bigfoot.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Wrong plan sequential scan instead of an index one  ("Claus Guttesen" <kometen@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Wrong plan sequential scan instead of an index one
List pgsql-performance
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Claus Guttesen wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> take a look at those plans:
>
> Try changing random_page_cost from the default 4 to 2 in postgresql.conf:
>
> random_page_cost = 2
>
> The default in postgresql is somewhat conservative. This setting
> indicates for postgresql how fast your disks are, the lower the
> faster.
>
> Could this setting be changed to 2 as default rather than 4?

I have tuned that number already at 2.5, lowering it to 2 doesn't change
the plan.

Regards
Gaetano Mendola
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGDOGa7UpzwH2SGd4RAjvaAKDAbz/vxwyOBPCILGpw8rBSvTFMtACfRPBe
yMge0RFfww0ef7xrGBLal7o=
=k+RM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Richard Huxton
Date:
Subject: Re: Wrong plan sequential scan instead of an index one
Next
From: Gaetano Mendola
Date:
Subject: Re: Wrong plan sequential scan instead of an index one