-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 03/29/07 14:51, Benjamin Arai wrote:
> I would prefer not to drop the index because the database is several
> hundred gigs. I would prefer to incrementally add to the index.
Some RDBMSs (well, one that I know of) has the ability to defer
index updates during data load, and it actually works very well.
The down side is that if there's a unique value constraint failure,
you don't know which record it failed on.
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
Give a man a fish, and he eats for a day.
Hit him with a fish, and he goes away for good!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFGDCClS9HxQb37XmcRAo0pAKCwqYwXOAPIXK25L9zhWhtGMFi/hwCgtA+x
zgc5Bz8wrVQ5UGocGe5v3s4=
=aFmR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
