Re: [PATCH] proposal for regexp_count, regexp_instr, regexp_substr and regexp_replace - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Gilles Darold
Subject Re: [PATCH] proposal for regexp_count, regexp_instr, regexp_substr and regexp_replace
Date
Msg-id 45fe2893-1efc-1666-3ea5-b5fb1918c7fa@gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] proposal for regexp_count, regexp_instr, regexp_substr and regexp_replace  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [PATCH] proposal for regexp_count, regexp_instr, regexp_substr and regexp_replace  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Le 21/03/2021 à 15:53, Tom Lane a écrit :
Chapman Flack <chap@anastigmatix.net> writes:
If this turns out to be a case of "attached the wrong patch, here's
the one that does implement foo_regex functions!" then I reserve an
objection to that. :)


And the patch renamed.

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Gilles Darold
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] proposal for regexp_count, regexp_instr, regexp_substr and regexp_replace
Next
From: Jan Wieck
Date:
Subject: Fix pg_upgrade to preserve datdba (was: Re: pg_upgrade failing for 200+ million Large Objects)