Re: real multi-master replication? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: real multi-master replication?
Date
Msg-id 45EB66D4.9030700@commandprompt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: real multi-master replication?  (Bill Moran <wmoran@potentialtech.com>)
List pgsql-general
> Well, it's multi-master to the degree that all servers are read/write,
> and therefore any server can take over.
>
> How would you define multi-master?
>
>
Per the original posts consideration, pgpool would have to be able to
deal with constants such as now() and current_date.
Can it?

Joshua D. Drake





pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: real multi-master replication?
Next
From: "Greg Sabino Mullane"
Date:
Subject: Re: Cannot digest subscribe