Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
>> Simon Riggs wrote:
>>
>>> If this is standards-breaking as you say, I would withdraw immediately.
>>> I checked the SQL standard and could not see how this would do so. The
>>> standard states SELECT * would return columns in order; it doesn't say
>>> what that order should be, nor does CREATE TABLE enforce the ordering to
>>> be the same as it has specified, AFAICS. Please correct me and I will
>>> withdraw. Practical issues seem far stronger drivers than standards
>>> issues here, which is why the parameter would default=off.
>> I did not follow the entire thread. I just wanted to point out that IIRC
>> MS SQL Server (and maybe also Sybase) do automatically optimize the
>> internal order of how columns are stored to move fixed length (which
>> also means non NULLable for these two servers) columns to the left.
>> Maybe this will serve as a reference point (not necessarily for
>> standards compliance of course).
>
> And that optimized ordering shows up with SELECT *?
no .. like i said its just the internal order ..
I think I learned this piece of information from reading "SQL
performance tuning" by Peter and Trudy .. dont have the book here right
now to give a page number.
regards,
Lukas
