Dave Page wrote:
> If you are savvy enough to read the docs, un-hide the directory, and
> manually create the file in the correct format, surely you can also run
> cacls on it? We expect *nix users to run chmod on theirs after all.
>
> I don't see this as such a big issue.
>
>
I think this is OK if we also go with your other suggestion of trusting
the default location, which will cover 95% of uses anyway.
cheers
andrew
