Paul Lambert wrote:
> Phillip Smith wrote:
>> "Having said that, if I switch it to a forward slash it works without
>> error... odd, given that weenblows standard is backslash."
>>
>> Yes, but PostgreSQL uses a back-slash as an escape character, which
>> needs to
>> be used to escape itself at an application level before the O/S gets
>> to deal
>> with it :)
>
> OK, that makes sense, cheers for the help.
Almost correct - PG is moving over to a more SQL standards-based
interpretation of what should be done with backslashes in strings. The
old behaviour will still be available by prefixing a string with E -
E'like this'.
See manuals for details.
-- Richard Huxton Archonet Ltd
