Re: Dead code in _bt_split? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Heikki Linnakangas
Subject Re: Dead code in _bt_split?
Date
Msg-id 45C5A956.5070603@enterprisedb.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Dead code in _bt_split?  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: Dead code in _bt_split?  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Heikki, did this code cleanup get included in your recent btree split
> fix?

No.

> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Heikki Linnakangas <heikki@enterprisedb.com> writes:
>>> In that case, newitemleft would be false, right?
>>> I'm saying the piece marked with X> below is unreachable:
>> Oh, I see.  Hmm ... probably so, I think that chunk of code was just
>> copied and pasted from where it occurs within the loop.

--   Heikki Linnakangas  EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Simon Riggs"
Date:
Subject: Re: Remove log segment and log_id fields from pg_controldata
Next
From: "Simon Riggs"
Date:
Subject: Re: Referential Integrity and SHARE locks