Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Partitioning - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Rigmor Ukuhe
Subject Re: Partitioning
Date
Msg-id 45BF1C32.9000902@finestmedia.ee
Whole thread Raw
In response to Partitioning  (Abu Mushayeed <abumushayeed@yahoo.com>)
List pgsql-performance
Tree view 
Abu Mushayeed wrote:
> I have partitioned a table based on period (e.g., cdate >=
> '2007-01-01'::date and cdate<=.2007-03-31':;date).
>
> Now, I am issuing query like cdate >= CURRENT_DATE - 1 and cdate <=
> CURRENT_DATE, it scans all the partitions. But if I do cdate >=
> '2007-01-01'::date and cdate<=.2007-03-31'::date it picks the correct
> partition. Also if I join the cdate field with another table, it does
> not pick the correct partition.
>
> I would like to know if it is possible to pick the correct partition
> using the above example.

from http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.1/interactive/ddl-partitioning.html

..."For the same reason, "stable" functions such as CURRENT_DATE must be
avoided. Joining the partition key to a column of another table will not be
optimized, either."...


Rigmor

>
> Thanks
> Abu
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Need Mail bonding?
> Go to the Yahoo! Mail Q&A
>
<http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/index;_ylc=X3oDMTFvbGNhMGE3BF9TAzM5NjU0NTEwOARfcwMzOTY1NDUxMDMEc2VjA21haWxfdGFnbGluZQRzbGsDbWFpbF90YWcx?link=ask&sid=396546091>

> for great tips from Yahoo! Answers
>
<http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/index;_ylc=X3oDMTFvbGNhMGE3BF9TAzM5NjU0NTEwOARfcwMzOTY1NDUxMDMEc2VjA21haWxfdGFnbGluZQRzbGsDbWFpbF90YWcx?link=ask&sid=396546091>

> users. !DSPAM:5,45beea6d287779832115503!


--
Rigmor Ukuhe
Finestmedia Ltd | Software Development Team Manager
gsm : (+372)56467729 | tel : (+372)6558043 | e-mail : rigmor.ukuhe@finestmedia.ee

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: "John Parnefjord"
Date:
Subject: Re: Tuning
Next
From: Pomarede Nicolas
Date:
Subject: Re: int4 vs varchar to store ip addr