Tom Lane wrote:
> I agree
> with having an explicit representation of a package in some new system
> catalog for that purpose. That does not translate to needing to add
> package hooks to every other catalog. Indirect links through schemas
> seem more than sufficient.
>
>
This seems like a good first step in growing a packaging infrastructure.
I'd rather grow it organically than try to design it all up front.
cheers
andrew
