Re: Predicted lifespan of different PostgreSQL branches - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: Predicted lifespan of different PostgreSQL branches
Date
Msg-id 45BC16DA.2060405@commandprompt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Predicted lifespan of different PostgreSQL branches  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-general
Tom Lane wrote:
> Oisin Glynn <me@oisinglynn.com> writes:
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Anyway I think that a fair case could be made for dropping the 8.0
>>> branch now, and maybe 8.1 too, as far as Windows support goes.
>
>> My 8.2c,
>> Having 8.1 end of life this soon after the release of 8.2 seems pretty
>> harsh.
>
> That's fine, I just wanted to run that idea up the flagpole and see if
> anyone would salute.  The important point is that no one has spoken
> against retiring 8.0-on-Windows now.  (Don't tell me people actually
> listened to us when we said not to run production with it ;-))

They didn't, but those of us they call quickly made them upgrade ;)

Sincerely,


Joshua D. Drake



--

      === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive  PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
             http://www.commandprompt.com/

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Predicted lifespan of different PostgreSQL branches
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Limit on number of users in postgresql?