Re: Piggybacking vacuum I/O - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Heikki Linnakangas
Subject Re: Piggybacking vacuum I/O
Date
Msg-id 45B899E0.5040403@enterprisedb.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Piggybacking vacuum I/O  ("Pavan Deolasee" <pavan.deolasee@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Piggybacking vacuum I/O  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Pavan Deolasee wrote:
> Another simpler solution for VACUUM would be to read the entire CLOG file
> in local memory. Most of the transaction status queries can be satisfied
> from
> this local copy and the normal CLOG is consulted only when the status is
> unknown (TRANSACTION_STATUS_IN_PROGRESS)

The clog is only for finished (committed/aborted/crashed) transactions.
If a transaction is in progress, the clog is never consulted. Anyway,
that'd only be reasonable for vacuums, and I'm actually more worried if
we had normal backends thrashing the clog buffers.

--   Heikki Linnakangas  EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Hannu Krosing
Date:
Subject: Re: Recursive Queries
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: tsearch in core patch, for inclusion