Tom Lane wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
>> But yeah, that's probably a good idea. A quick look at the code says we
>> should at least ask people who have this problem to give it a run with
>> logging at DEBUG5 which should then log exactly what the errorcode was.
>> Or are you seeing more places that need such logging first?
>
> DEBUG5 is going to be a bit voluminous, but let's try that if we can.
Perhaps we should switch down the DEBUG level of it, at least until we
know what happens?
//Magnus
